<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>drzy &#187; checkers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drzy.com/tag/checkers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drzy.com</link>
	<description>incriminating evidence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:09:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Checkers solved</title>
		<link>http://www.drzy.com/2007/07/20/checkers-solved/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drzy.com/2007/07/20/checkers-solved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rosicrux</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[checkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[math]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drzy.com/2007/07/20/checkers-solved/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reducing the game of checkers into a group of algorithms of movement, computer scientist Jonathan Schaeffer has developed a program called Chinook that he has proven that at the least will draw. Apparently checkers played in a perfect game will always end in a draw. Forget hoity-toity chess programs, Chinook has long ago ditched any [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div class="KonaBody">
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<!--INFOLINKS_ON-->
<p><p>Reducing the game of checkers into a group of algorithms of movement, computer scientist Jonathan Schaeffer has developed a program called <a href="http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/~chinook/" target="_blank">Chinook</a> that he has proven that at the least will draw.  Apparently checkers played in a perfect game will always end in a draw.  </p>
<p>Forget hoity-toity chess programs, Chinook has long ago ditched any human competition.  The work since then was only to find an unbeatable game, and a proof to the algorithm that is the game of checkers.  On the Chinook website is a link to the proof for verification.  (I started to, but then I realized how much non-fun I had in my discrete math and program verification course, and decided to put it off until never.)</p>
<p>You can also play against the program, in a more dumbed-down version that is difficult, but that won&#8217;t always win.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa003&#038;articleID=DBE35D70-E7F2-99DF-3ECB392CEF7AC028" target="_blank"><em>More on this story at Scientific American</em></a></p>

<!--INFOLINKS_OFF-->
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
</div> <!-- KonaBody -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drzy.com/2007/07/20/checkers-solved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

